Attested.to

CLAIM № 0WUpxhv6 · IN CommonParlance

Human suffering is bad; human thriving is good.

· Finalized September 13, 2026 17:10 · View the broader statement ·

Affirmed

Cite this statement

APA

Affirmed: Human suffering is bad; human thriving is good. (November 1, 2026). Attested.to. Retrieved November 1, 2026, from https://attested.to/claims/0WUpxhv6.

MLA

"Affirmed: Human suffering is bad; human thriving is good." Attested.to, 1 Nov. 2026, https://attested.to/claims/0WUpxhv6.

Chicago

"Affirmed: Human suffering is bad; human thriving is good." Attested.to. November 1, 2026. https://attested.to/claims/0WUpxhv6.

BibTeX

@misc{attested_0wupxhv6, title = {Affirmed: Human suffering is bad; human thriving is good}, author = {Attested.to}, year = {2026}, month = {November 1}, url = {https://attested.to/claims/0WUpxhv6}, note = {Verdicts may change; the page always shows the current state.}, }

Verdicts may change; the page always shows the current state.

Sign in to watch
Why this holds

Verdict when satisfied:

Affirmed

this is an attestation.

Why maintain this knowledge?

No justification recorded. This does not mean the knowledge is unjustified; no applicable assessment has been adopted.

Particular uses

These assessments concern specific investigations, audiences, or applications. They do not replace the default justification or authorize other uses.

No particular uses recorded here.

Review or propose an assessment

Purpose authoring is optional. Propose a more specific default or a particular use only when there is something more specific to say. Each proposal includes its scope and reasoning in one market.

Propose an assessment

Purpose assessments are separate from factual reasoning and context admission. A missing or denied purpose does not change a factual verdict or prevent context creation.

Machine-readable purpose record

Verdict history
    1. Affirmed

      Since September 13, 2026 17:10

    2. Now
Relevant markets

Trace reasoning